Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Oil is not a curse : ownership structure and institutions in Soviet successor states / Pauline Jones Luong and Erika Weinthal.

by Jones, Pauline (Professor of political science); Weinthal, Erika.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Cambridge studies in comparative politics: Publisher: New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010Description: xiii, 425 p. : ill., maps ; 24 cm.ISBN: 9780521765770 (hbk.); 0521765773 (hbk.); 9780521148085 (pbk.); 0521148081 (pbk.).Subject(s): Petroleum industry and trade -- Soviet Union | Commonwealth of Independent StatesDDC classification: 333 Online resources: Contributor biographical information | Publisher description | Table of contents only
Contents:
Rethinking the resource curse : ownership structure and institutions in mineral rich states -- Why fiscal regimes : taxation and expenditure in mineral rich states -- State ownership with control versus private domestic ownership -- Two version of rentierism : state ownership with control in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan -- Petroleum rents without rentierism : domestic private ownership in the Russian Federation -- State ownership without control versus private foreign ownership -- Eluding the obsolescing bargain : state ownership without control in Azerbaijan -- Revisiting the obsolescing bargain : foreign private ownership in Kazakhstan -- Taking domestic politics seriously : explaining the structure of ownership over mineral resources -- The myth of the resource curse.
Summary: "This book makes two central claims: first, that mineral-rich states are cursed not by their wealth but, rather, by the ownership structure they choose to manage their mineral wealth and second, that weak institutions are not inevitable in mineral-rich states. Each represents a significant departure from the conventional resource curse literature, which has treated ownership structure as a constant across time and space and has presumed that mineral-rich countries are incapable of either building or sustaining strong institutions - particularly fiscal regimes. The experience of the five petroleum-rich Soviet successor states (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) provides a clear challenge to both of these assumptions. Their respective developmental trajectories since independence demonstrate not only that ownership structure can vary even across countries that share the same institutional legacy but also that this variation helps to explain the divergence in their subsequent fiscal regimes"--Provided by publisher.Summary: "This book makes two central claims: First, that mineral-rich states are cursed not by their wealth per se but rather by the ownership structure they chose to manage their mineral wealth; and second, that weak institutions are not inevitable in mineral-rich states. Each claim represents a significant departure from the conventional 'resource curse' literature, which has treated ownership structure as a constant across time and space and presumed that mineral-rich countries are incapable of either building or sustaining strong institutions - particularly fiscal regimes. The experience of the five petroleum-rich Soviet successor states (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) provides a clear challenge to both of these assumptions. Their respective developmental trajectories since independence demonstrate not only that ownership structure can vary even across countries that share the same institutional legacy, but also that this variation helps explain the divergence in their subsequent fiscal regimes"--Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due
წიგნები წიგნები სამართლისა და პოლიტიკის სკოლის ბიბლიოთეკა
საცავი
333 Available

Includes bibliographical references (p. 361-397) and index.

Rethinking the resource curse : ownership structure and institutions in mineral rich states -- Why fiscal regimes : taxation and expenditure in mineral rich states -- State ownership with control versus private domestic ownership -- Two version of rentierism : state ownership with control in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan -- Petroleum rents without rentierism : domestic private ownership in the Russian Federation -- State ownership without control versus private foreign ownership -- Eluding the obsolescing bargain : state ownership without control in Azerbaijan -- Revisiting the obsolescing bargain : foreign private ownership in Kazakhstan -- Taking domestic politics seriously : explaining the structure of ownership over mineral resources -- The myth of the resource curse.

"This book makes two central claims: first, that mineral-rich states are cursed not by their wealth but, rather, by the ownership structure they choose to manage their mineral wealth and second, that weak institutions are not inevitable in mineral-rich states. Each represents a significant departure from the conventional resource curse literature, which has treated ownership structure as a constant across time and space and has presumed that mineral-rich countries are incapable of either building or sustaining strong institutions - particularly fiscal regimes. The experience of the five petroleum-rich Soviet successor states (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) provides a clear challenge to both of these assumptions. Their respective developmental trajectories since independence demonstrate not only that ownership structure can vary even across countries that share the same institutional legacy but also that this variation helps to explain the divergence in their subsequent fiscal regimes"--Provided by publisher.

"This book makes two central claims: First, that mineral-rich states are cursed not by their wealth per se but rather by the ownership structure they chose to manage their mineral wealth; and second, that weak institutions are not inevitable in mineral-rich states. Each claim represents a significant departure from the conventional 'resource curse' literature, which has treated ownership structure as a constant across time and space and presumed that mineral-rich countries are incapable of either building or sustaining strong institutions - particularly fiscal regimes. The experience of the five petroleum-rich Soviet successor states (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) provides a clear challenge to both of these assumptions. Their respective developmental trajectories since independence demonstrate not only that ownership structure can vary even across countries that share the same institutional legacy, but also that this variation helps explain the divergence in their subsequent fiscal regimes"--Provided by publisher.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
ყველა უფლება დაცულია © 2018 GIPA.GE
All rights reserved © 2018 GIPA.GE